Analisis karya tulis ilmiah dosen Institut Pertanian Bogor terindeks Scopus sampai tahun 2021

  • Rita Komalasari IPB University



 Librarians, as information’s manager, must be able to take advantage of all available sources of information, both printed and electronic, relevant and uptodate present information. They have to be able serve information to the academic community in both printed and/or electroric documents. Information about scientific papers produced by IPB University Lecture or researcher are very important and o fcourse useful for the progress of research in the future. One of the tools to determine the development of research that has been carried out by IPB University lecturers or  to examine the trend researchs  is scopus .com. The purpose of this study is to determine the profile of IPB University Lecturers’s scientific paper indexed by scopus until 2021. In this study, will be presented information and analysis of documents based on subject, documents by author, by years, by country or territory and based on funding sponsors. The method used in this study is a review analysis of the subscribed scopus databased at the IPB University Library. The analysys showed that agricultural and biological science, occupied the top rank with 3674 documents, followed by environmental sciences with 3038 documents. Documents basen on subjec area, occupy by environmental sciences with score 23, 8%. Document by type is Articles that occupied the top rank, with score 50,6%.


Keywords: Librarian; information managers; scientific papers; IPB Lecturer;


References (2021). Diakses tgl. 12 Mei. (2021). diakses 10 Mei (2021). Diakses tgl. 18 mei.
Direktorat Riset dan Inovasi IPB. (2018). 415 IPB’s Innovations in 1.045 Indonesia’s Innovations. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Komalasari, R. (2019). E-Resources Untuk Riset dan Inovasi. Jurnal Ikatan Pustakawan Indonesia (Vol. 4, Issue 1).
Malanski, P. D., Dedieu, B., & Schiavi, S. (2021). Mapping the research domains on work in agriculture. A bibliometric review from Scopus database. In Journal of Rural Studies (Vol. 81, pp. 305–314). Elsevier Ltd.
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177.
Moed, H. F., De Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., & Lopez-Illescas, C. (2021). Are nationally oriented journals indexed in Scopus becoming more international? The effect of publication language and access modality. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2).
Montoya, F. G., Alcayde, A., Baños, R., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018). A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 168–185.
Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435.
Walther, M., & Melsheimer, B. (2019). Automated author affiliation processing using Scopus data. Procedia Computer Science, 146, 53–59.
How to Cite
Komalasari, R. (2021). Analisis karya tulis ilmiah dosen Institut Pertanian Bogor terindeks Scopus sampai tahun 2021. LIBRARIA : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 10(1), 17 - 32. Retrieved from