Menemukan kembali esensi perpustakaan dalam relevansi dan transformasi literasi di era digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66162/lib.v14i1.545Keywords:
digital literacy, librarian competence, library transformationAbstract
The digital revolution has given rise to a literacy paradox in Indonesia. Amidst the current abundance of information access, there is no corresponding improvement in the quality of the public's digital comprehension. This situation demands a strategic transformation of libraries to remain relevant and functional in the modern era. This study aims to identify and analyze library transformation strategies that can be adopted to address this literacy gap. Using a qualitative method through a comprehensive literature review, this study analyzes various academic findings and current practices. The conclusion of this research reveals that an effective strategic library transformation must be built upon three pillars, where librarians must evolve from collection managers into Digital Literacy Guides, User Experience Architects, and Community Problem-Solving Partners who actively educate the public to navigate, evaluate, and utilize digital information critically and ethically. The integration of these three pillars is directed at addressing the root cause of the literacy paradox: by positioning libraries as knowledge curators and adaptive community innovation hubs. The application of this model is expected to optimize the role of libraries as adaptive and inclusive knowledge curators and community innovation centers within society. Thus, this transformation represents a fundamental repositioning of libraries from mere access providers into institutions that actively build societal literacy resilience. Consequently, libraries become a solid and dynamic foundation of knowledge amidst the increasingly rapid flow of digital information.
References
American Library Association. (2023, September 19). American Library Association Releases Preliminary Data on 2023 Book Challenges. Diambil kembali dari https://www.ala.org/news/2016/09/american-library-association-releases-preliminary-data-2023-book-challenges
APJII. (2024, Februari 7). APJII Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 221 Juta Orang. Diambil kembali dari https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Casson, L. (2001). Libraries in the Ancient world. America: Yale University Press.
Center for Digital Society. (2023). Menangkal Misinformasi Krisis Iklim di Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Einsthendi, A. D., Rasyid, M. I., & Wicaksono, J. B. (2024). Augmented Reality: Impact on student engagement and learning. Hipkin Journal of Education Research, 1, 239-250. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.64014/hipkin-jer.v1i2.22
Emmanuel, V. O. (2020). History and Development of Libraries. ApplauseB multi-Sectors.
Hidayat, R., Kusumasari, I. R., Sophia, Z. A., & Puspita, D. R. (2024). Peran Teknologi AI dalam Mengoptimalkan Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Pengembangan Bisnis. Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 1, 167-178. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v1i4.905
IFLA. (2023, November 20). Developing a library strategic response to Artificial Intelligence. Diambil kembali dari https://www.ifla.org/g/ai/developing-a-library-strategic-response-to-artificial-intelligence/
IPLM. (2024). Kajian Indeks Pembangunan Literasi Masyarakat (IPLM) Tahun 2024. Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Katadata Insight Center. (2023). Status Literasi Digital di Indonesia 2022. Kominfo.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital. (2025, Januari 8). Komdigi Identifikasi 1.923 Konten Hoaks Sepanjang Tahun 2024. Diambil kembali dari https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/detail/komdigi-identifikasi-1923-konten-hoaks-sepanjang-tahun-2024
Komdigi. (2020, Agustus 26). Teknologi Masyarakat Indonesia: Malas Baca Tapi Cerewet di Medsos. Diambil kembali dari https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/sorotan-media/detail/teknologi-masyarakat-indonesia-malas-baca-tapi-cerewet-di-medsos
Komdigi. (2024, Mei 5). Indeks Literasi Digital Indonesia Menurut Pilar Tahun 2021-2022. Diambil kembali dari https://data.komdigi.go.id/opendata/dataset/indeks-literasi-digital-indonesia-menurut-pilar
Maesaroh, I. (2020). Perpustakaan Digital Dalam Penguatan Akses Informasi. Jakarta Selatan: Damera Press.
Maftuhah. (2024). Strategi Pengembangan Literasi Digital untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif dalam Era Society 5.0. Progressa Journal of Islamic Religious Instruction, 8, 123-131. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.32616/pgr.v8.2.494.123-131
Maslahah, K., & Mahardika, M. C. (2021). Transformasi Perpustakaan: Melihat Perpustakaan Dari Masa Ke Masa. Journal of Documentation and Information Science. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.33505/jodis.v4i2.204
OECD. (2023). Schools as hubs for social and emotional learning–Are schools and teachers ready? OECD Education Spotlights.
Perpusnas. (2024, Juli 18). Perpusnas Dorong Penyediaan Bahan Perpustakaan Bermutu dan inklusif. Diambil kembali dari https://www.perpusnas.go.id/berita/perpusnas-dorong-penyediaan-bahan-perpustakaan-bermutu-dan-inklusif
Perpusnas. (2025, Oktober 6). Jumlah Kunjungan ke Perpusnas Terus Turun. Diambil kembali dari https://goodstats.id/article/jumlah-kunjungan-ke-perpusnas-terus-turun-2hKRM
Sharma, V., Sati, P. P., & Vandana. (2020). Digital Transformation in Libraries Challenges, Opportunities, and Evolving Needs of Users. Innovative Library Practices in Digital Era, 167-171. Diambil kembali dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389498384_Digital_Transformation_in_Libraries_Challenges_Opportunities_and_Evolving_Needs_of_Users
Stanford Education. (2016, Desember 22). Stanford researchers find students have trouble judging the credibility of information online. Diambil kembali dari https://ed.stanford.edu/news/stanford-researchers-find-students-have-trouble-judging-credibility-information-online
Sulistyo-Basuki. (2018, Maret 15). Diskusi Memetakan Perkembangan Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi di Indonesia. Diambil kembali dari Sains Informasi atau Ilmu Informasi: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/29642/
Syahda, F. L. (2024). Pentingnya Pendidikan Etika Digital Dalam Konteks SDGs 2030. Perspektif: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Bahasa, 2, 66-80. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.59059/perspektif.v2i2.1259
Syahidan, A. (2024). Digital Transformation in the Management of the National Archives of the Republic of Indonesia: A Qualitative Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities in Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Archive Management. Social Impact Journal, 64-71. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.61391/sij.v3i1.152
Tjiptasari, F. (2022). Perkembangan Perpustakaan Tradisional Menuju Digital. Media Informasi, 31. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.22146/mi.v31i1.4575
Toya, J. (2023). Evolusi Perpustakaan dari Tradisional ke Digital. Attractive : Innovative Education Journal, 5. Diambil kembali dari https://share.google/PWb0BQV3mJw3K3hcs
Valentina, A., Suryandoko, W., Abdillah, A., Sabri, I., & Handayaningrum, W. (2025). Mendidik Konten Kreator Masa Depan: Edukasi Siswa Remaja Untuk Memproduksi Konten Kreatif di Era Media Sosial. Edutech: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 246-256. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v24i1.76893
Vitriana, N. (2024). Transformasi perpustakaan di era digital native. Librarium: Library and Information Science Journal, 1, 59-69. Diambil kembali dari https://doi.org/10.53088/librarium.v1i1.693
We Are Social. (2024, Januari 31). Digital 2024: 5 Billion Social Media Users. Diambil kembali dari https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/





